At the recent Hellam Township supervisors meeting held on August 1, tensions flared once again as residents voiced their mounting concerns over the township's controversial short-term rental ordinance. This wasn’t the first time the issue had taken center stage. At a prior meeting on July 18, a couple presented compelling video evidence to Zoning Officer Jason Test, documenting trespassing incidents by short-term renters on their property. According to the homeowners, the situation has escalated over time, with numerous videos showing repeated instances of trespassing by vacation renters.

​

Repeated Violations and Growing Frustration

The couple explained that the problem went beyond mere trespassing. They frequently observed renters blatantly exceeding the legal occupancy limits set for the nearby short-term rental property. In addition, renters were seen engaging in recreational activities on the couple's property without permission, such as fishing in the adjacent river and launching kayaks from their private yard. For these residents, this ongoing issue represented a serious breach of their privacy and property rights. Frustration boiled over as they described how short-term rentals in residential zones have transformed their once quiet neighborhood into a source of continuous disruption.

​

Residents Demand Stricter Measures or a Total Ban

During the meeting, numerous residents echoed the couple’s concerns, raising the larger question of whether short-term rentals belong in residential areas at all. Many argued that these vacation rental properties should be classified and regulated as businesses, given their impact on the neighborhood. Residents called for a comprehensive solution, with some pushing for a total ban on short-term rentals in residential zones, while others advocated for stronger regulatory measures, including regular inspections. "Why should inspections only happen when there’s a complaint? There needs to be accountability before problems arise," one resident remarked.

​

Township Supervisors Weigh Options

Hellam Township supervisors listened attentively to the residents' concerns, but solutions to the problem remain elusive. Supervisor Michael Shillott acknowledged the severity of the issue and assured residents that the ordinance would be a priority at the upcoming planning commission meeting. “We understand your frustration, and this will be at the top of the agenda,” he reassured the crowd, offering a glimmer of hope for those seeking change.

​

Township Manager Corina Mann introduced the idea of hiring a dedicated code enforcer who would specifically monitor short-term rental properties for violations. According to Mann, a code enforcer would address many of the problems by regularly inspecting properties and ensuring compliance with the township's short-term rental rules. However, this potential solution came with its own set of challenges.

​

Cost of Enforcement Raises Concerns

Supervisor Nedette Otterbein voiced her concerns over the financial implications of hiring a full-time code enforcer. She estimated that the cost to the township could be around $100,000 annually, once salary, fees, and vehicle expenses were factored in. "It's a significant investment, and we’ll have to carefully weigh whether the township can afford this level of enforcement," Otterbein said. This financial burden sparked a larger discussion about how to balance the needs of residents with the township’s budget constraints.

​

Supervisor Mark Myers suggested an alternative solution that wouldn’t strain the township’s budget: volunteers. Myers proposed enlisting local volunteers to assist in enforcing the short-term rental rules. While the idea of volunteers raised eyebrows among some attendees, Myers emphasized that it could be a more cost-effective way to ensure the rules are followed. “We need to explore all our options, and perhaps this is one way to keep costs down while still addressing the issues,” he said.

​

What’s Next for Hellam Township?

As the debate rages on, Hellam Township’s supervisors face tough decisions regarding how to regulate short-term rentals effectively. Supervisor Otterbein noted that the costs associated with hiring a code enforcement officer would be a key consideration when the township begins planning the future budget for zoning and planning.

​

With the next board meeting scheduled for 6 p.m. on August 15, residents are eagerly awaiting the outcome. Will the township move to ban short-term rentals in residential zones altogether? Will they hire an enforcement officer to monitor short-term rental properties, or will they introduce stricter regulations like regular inspections? The future of short-term rentals in Hellam Township hangs in the balance, and the upcoming meeting is likely to be pivotal.

​

Broader Implications for Short-Term Rentals in Small Towns

The ongoing discussion in Hellam Township reflects a larger trend seen in communities across the country. As short-term rentals grow in popularity, small towns are grappling with the challenges they bring; ranging from noise and privacy concerns to occupancy violations and property misuse. While many residents welcome the economic boost that vacation rentals provide, others are quick to point out the downsides, especially when it comes to maintaining the character of residential neighborhoods.

​

What Hellam Township decides could serve as a case study for other communities facing similar issues. The balance between protecting residents' rights and promoting tourism is a delicate one, and how the township handles this matter could influence policies in neighboring areas.

​

Looking Ahead

For now, residents of Hellam Township will have to wait and see how the township’s supervisors respond to their concerns. But one thing is clear: the issue of short-term rentals is not going away. As communities across the country wrestle with similar challenges, the decisions made in Hellam could set a precedent for how small towns approach short-term rental regulation in the future. The outcome of the August 15 meeting will be closely watched, both by residents and by those with a vested interest in the future of short-term rentals.